Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Oct. 30, 2007

Prosecutors' emails on a letter to Jay Lefkowitz and civil litigation, Oct. 2007

Two federal prosecutors discuss a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, defense attacks on the case attorney, FBI agent meetings, and keeping the criminal case separate from civil litigation.Machine-written summary

EFTA00189175

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:18 PM
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
RE: Letter to Jay

Marie,

I think you should emphasize that they should treat this as they would any similarly situated matter and not try to influence the outcome of the civil litigation. In other words, once the criminal investigation is over, their involvement should cease. I had a similar situation in private practice. I’ll never forget trying to get information from the FBI agents concerning a convicted pedophile who had been hired to work at a school for autistic children. In representing some of the children, we thought the FBI would find a way to provide us with information we were looking for. The FBI refused to provide anything and claimed that their investigative work was privileged. I assume that the same would apply here. The victims’ lawyer(s) will interview the girls and hopefully piece together the important aspects of each case. Any legal steps taken to compel testimony or evidence would be handled by FBI general counsel who will respond accordingly. Regarding Bert Ocariz, Lefkowitz stated that he seems like a solid lawyer but that since you were involved in his potential appearance in this matter they would probably object to his selection. Lefkowitz put an additional insidious spin on it that I can’t quite remember. I hope that you understand that these ad hominem attacks against you do not diminish in our eyes what you and the agents have accomplished. Take care,

Jeff

From:Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:51 PM
To:Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Subject:Letter to Jay

Hi Jeff – You don’t have to show me the letter to Jay before it goes out, I would just appreciate a copy for the file.

Thank you for the advice and the pep talk. The funny thing is that I had never met (and still haven’t met) or spoken to Bert Ocariz before I asked him if he would be willing to take on this case. I just figured if Judge Jordan and E.J. trusted him completely, he would be willing to go to the mat for the victims. But as soon as you mentioned the appearance problem, I saw where the problem would arise and agreed that the Special Master would be a safer route. I just worry that the defense’s attacks on me could harm the victims.

I am going to set up the meeting with the FBI agents for later this week. Other than the general discussion about staying out of the civil litigation, is there anything in particular that you want me to tell them?

Thanks.

A. Marie Villafaña

Assistant U.S. Attorney

500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Phone 561 209-1047

Fax 561 820-8777

2664

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014261

Prosecutors' emails on a letter to Jay Lefkowitz and civil litigation, Oct. 2007

Emails and letters

Two federal prosecutors discuss a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, defense attacks on the case attorney, FBI agent meetings, and keeping the criminal case separate from civil litigation.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Oct. 30, 2007

EFTA00189175 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <table <tr <td From:</td </tr <tr <td Sent:</td </tr <tr <td To:</td </tr <tr <td Subject:</td </tr </table <table border="1" <tr <td Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:18 PM</td </tr <tr <td Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td RE: Letter to Jay</td </tr </table Marie, I think you should emphasize that they should treat this as they would any similarly situated matter and not try to influence the outcome of the civil litigation. In other words, once the criminal investigation is over, their involvement …