Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · May 27, 2008

Prosecutor emails on Epstein's plea negotiations and statute of limitations, May 2008

Internal emails among federal prosecutors discussing the DAG's willingness to hear Epstein's counsel, statute of limitations concerns, and opposition to Epstein serving less time.Machine-written summary

EFTA00180287

Subject: RE: Epstein

Hey N

Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein’s counsel to present further arguments. $ has requested N and I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. $ mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don’t know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels.

From: . (USAFLS) [

Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM

To: $ \textcircled{1} $ (USAFLS); $ \textcircled{2} $ (USAFLS)

Cc: (USAFLS)

Subject: Epstein

Hi I sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks.

1009

EFTA00180288

(USAFLS)

Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein’s counsel to present further arguments. has requested and I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don’t know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but I’m not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels.

Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM

Subject: Epstein

Hi . sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks.

1010

Prosecutor emails on Epstein's plea negotiations and statute of limitations, May 2008

Emails and letters

Internal emails among federal prosecutors discussing the DAG's willingness to hear Epstein's counsel, statute of limitations concerns, and opposition to Epstein serving less time.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · May 27, 2008

EFTA00180287 Subject: RE: Epstein Hey N Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. $ has requested N and I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. $ mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigato…