Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Sept. 17, 2008

2008 DOJ emails on sealing the Epstein non-prosecution agreement

Email chain among federal prosecutors and the Palm Beach state attorney's office discussing a newspaper's challenge to the sealed Epstein non-prosecution agreement.Machine-written summary

EFTA00179876

From:Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Sent:Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:25 AM
To:Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lee,Dexter(USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen(USAFLS)
Cc:Garcia, Rolando(USAFLS)
Subject:RE: State Jeffrey Epstein

Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren’t we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn’t be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it’s the SAO’s call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believe are appropriate. Wait till others have had a chance to weigh in on this issue.

To: Acosta, Alex(USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff(USAFLS); Senior, Robert(USAFLS); Lee, Dexter(USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen(USAFLS)
Cc: Garcia, Rolando(USAFLS)

Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle this issue?

A. Marie Villafaña

Assistant U.S. Attorney

500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Phone 561 209-1047

Fax 561 820-8777

From:Garcia, Rolando(USAFLS)
Sent:Wednesday, September 17,2008 10:48 AM
To:Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS)
Subject:FW: State Jeffrey Epstein

From: Barry Krischer [mailto:Bkrische@sa15.state.fl.us]

Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:46 AM

To: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)

Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea.

From:Lanna Belohlavek
Sent:Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM
To:Barry Krischer
Subject:FW: State Jeffrey Epstein

53

EFTA00179877

How to proceed? Lanna

From:Bryce Albu [mailto:bryce@reederandreeder.com]
Sent:Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM
To:Lanna Belohlavek
Cc:Martin Reeder
Subject:State v. Jeffrey Epstein

We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience.

Very truly yours,

C. Bryce Albu

Reeder & Reeder P.A.

250 S. Central Blvd., Suite 200

Jupiter, FL 33458

Direct Dial: (561) 575-9721

Facsimile: (561) 575-9765

bryce@reederandreeder.com

54

2008 DOJ emails on sealing the Epstein non-prosecution agreement

Emails and letters

Email chain among federal prosecutors and the Palm Beach state attorney's office discussing a newspaper's challenge to the sealed Epstein non-prosecution agreement.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Sept. 17, 2008

EFTA00179876 <table border="1" <tr <td From:</td <td Senior, Robert (USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Sent:</td <td Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:25 AM</td </tr <tr <td To:</td <td Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lee,Dexter(USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen(USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Cc:</td <td Garcia, Rolando(USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Subject:</td <td RE: State Jeffrey Epstein</td </tr </table Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren’t we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn’t be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is …