Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Sept. 23, 2008

Judge Marra order denying Epstein motions as moot, Sept. 2008

EFTA00175642

Case 9:08-cv J119-KAM Docu. nt 43 Entere on FLSD Docket 0. 3/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA

Jane Doe No. 2,

Plaintiff, vs.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AS MOOT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (DE 13) and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (DE 40). As Plaintiff’s Complaint has been replaced by an Amended Complaint, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (DE 13) is DENIED as moot.

(2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (DE 40) is DENIED as moot. This denial is without prejudice to Defendant reasserting the grounds asserted in the motion if he deems it appropriate as to the Amended Complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 23rd day of September, 2008.

copies to:

KENNETH A. MARRA

United States District Judge

All counsel of record

Judge Marra order denying Epstein motions as moot, Sept. 2008

Court filings

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Sept. 23, 2008

EFTA00175642 Case 9:08-cv J119-KAM Docu. nt 43 Entere on FLSD Docket 0. 3/2008 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AS MOOT THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (DE 13) and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (DE 40). As Plaintiff’s Complaint has been replaced by an Amended Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Defendant's Motion for Enlargeme…