Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 29, 2023

Correspondence, 2023-03-29

EFTA00162422

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Urgent: FinCEN matter

Privileged/Confidential

Hope all is well. I understand that you work with as the FBI reps/liaisons to FinCEN? And you may have been assisting with ensuring that disclosing the Epstein-related SARs (subject to a protective order) in the Epstein-related litigation in the Southern District of New York won’t cause problems for the FBI?

If so, given that is on leave today, I was asked to check in with you and see if you could give us at FinCEN a brief progress report. Just a sentence or two would suffice. For example, I assume you all are still reviewing the first set of subjects, which has previously estimated you all would need until this Wednesday to complete? (And thus haven’t started on the second set yet?) Any updates I can pass up the chain this afternoon?

Thanks!

From:

Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 4:53 PM

Subject: Re: Urgent: FinCEN matter

Hi, understood. Is it possible for your colleague to start running the checks on the new tranche that sent earlier, with a goal of wrapping everything up when you return if possible? We are looking to show that things are in motion. The colleague can send us results on a rolling basis if that would work.

If there are any issues with prioritization across the FinCEN projects, please let us know. The Front Office can help.

Let us know if you or your colleague would like to discuss.

Many thanks.

From

Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 2:46:00 PM

Subject: [EXTERNAL]RE: Urgent: FinCEN matter

Correspondence, 2023-03-29

Emails and letters

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · March 29, 2023

EFTA00162422 Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Urgent: FinCEN matter Privileged/Confidential Hope all is well. I understand that you work with as the FBI reps/liaisons to FinCEN? And you may have been assisting with ensuring that disclosing the Epstein-related SARs (subject to a protective order) in the Epstein-related litigation in the Southern District of New York won’t cause problems for the FBI? If so, given that is on leave today, I was asked to check in with you and see if you could give us at FinCEN a brief progress report. Just a sentence or two would suffice. For example, I assume you a…