Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Government memo · Dec. 14, 2021

Prosecutor note to file on call with a private individual about defense witness list

A prosecutor's note recording a call with a private individual about whether the defense would call a witness named at trial.Machine-written summary

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Note to file re call with Peter Brill re

Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 21:07:02 +0000

Importance: Normal

I just spoke on the phone with Peter Brill. I informed him of the nature of my conversation with earlier today (see previous note to file). Brill asked why the defense would want to call . I said that the only relevance I could think of was that one of the victims at trial testified that someone named was present for sex acts after that victim was over the age of consent, but the victim did not say it was and did not identify as the person who engaged in sex acts. I further informed Brill that I did not know whether or not Epstein had engaged in any sexual activity with . Brill asked for defense counsel’s contact information, and I gave him number. I told Brill we would like to speak with if she remains on the defense witness list, and Brill indicated he understood.

EFTA00156008

Prosecutor note to file on call with a private individual about defense witness list

Government memos

A prosecutor's note recording a call with a private individual about whether the defense would call a witness named at trial.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Dec. 14, 2021

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Note to file re call with Peter Brill re Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 21:07:02 +0000 Importance: Normal I just spoke on the phone with Peter Brill. I informed him of the nature of my conversation with earlier today (see previous note to file). Brill asked why the defense would want to call . I said that the only relevance I could think of was that one of the victims at trial testified that someone named was present for sex acts after that victim was over the age of consent, but the victim did not say it was and did not identify as the person who engaged in sex acts. I fur…