Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · March 4, 2023

SDNY order on review of Epstein Estate video materials, March 2023

Court order directing the Epstein Estate to review video materials for subpoenas, with protocols for possible CSAM and FBI notification.Machine-written summary

EFTA00144397

Case122cv10604JSR Document1001 Filed03/27/23 Page1of2 Case122cv10904JSR Document1112 Filed04/05/23 Page1of2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED

STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS

Plaintiff,

V.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

Third-Party Plaintiff,

V.

JAMES EDWARD STALEY

Third-Party Defendant.

Case Number: 1:22-cv-10904-JSR

ORDER REGARDING REVIEW OF VIDEOMATERIALS

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and the authority of this Court to administer its proceedings, and finding good cause established in the stipulated motion filed by Jane Doe 1 and the Government of the United States Virgin Islands, the Court orders that:

  1. The Epstein Estate shall review the Epstein Media to determine its responsiveness to the subpoenas that have been issued by Jane Doe 1 and other parties to the related litigations.

  2. If, during the course of that review, the Estate sees a particular recording that appears to contain possible CSAM, it shall promptly stop further review of that recording and notify the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) or such other agency or entity as the FBI may

EFTA00144398

Case1.22cv10904JSR Document1001 Filed04/05/23 Page20pf72

direct of the recording’s existence. No CSAM shall be copied or transmitted to another party, except as directed by the FBI or other government agency.

  1. If no CSAM is observed during the review, the Responsive Media will be provided counsel for Jane Doe 1 and the Government in response to the relevant subpoena. To the extent Responsive Media is identified prior to the identification of possible CSAM, such materials also will be produced to counsel. Counsel for Jane Doe 1 and any other recipient of Responsive Media may then use this material for the prosecution or defense of the above-captioned case and make such further disclosures as are required by civil discovery rules (e.g., appropriate disclosures to opposing counsel).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2023

John S. Robb

New York, New York

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

SDNY order on review of Epstein Estate video materials, March 2023

Court filings

Court order directing the Epstein Estate to review video materials for subpoenas, with protocols for possible CSAM and FBI notification.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · March 4, 2023

EFTA00144397 Case122cv10604JSR Document1001 Filed03/27/23 Page1of2 Case122cv10904JSR Document1112 Filed04/05/23 Page1of2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS Plaintiff, V. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Third-Party Plaintiff, V. JAMES EDWARD STALEY Third-Party Defendant. Case Number: 1:22-cv-10904-JSR ORDER REGARDING REVIEW OF VIDEOMATERIALS Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and the authority of this Court to administer its proceedings, and finding…