My understanding is that those qualifiers are accurate. Thanks.¶
Here’s the attachment¶
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests¶
I have added some qualifiers in track changes. Are they accurate?¶
And does the team see any additional issue now?¶
John,¶
I don’t think I received an approval from you for the updated letter draft. Apologies if I’ve overlooked an email on that.¶
I’m attaching the current draft here again—please let me know if it doesn’t address the concerns you had.¶
Thanks,¶
Steven¶
From: McEnany, John (USANYS) <¶
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 8:18 PM¶
EFTA00104400¶
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests¶
Ha. Check with Steven on the status of this.¶
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests¶
John,¶
In connection with this, have you approved the letter to go out?¶
thanks very much, Alex.¶
BTW, I probably don’t need to tell you, our Touhy communications with VB are probably disclosable as Giglio info.¶
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests¶
John,¶
Per our call yesterday, please find attached an updated letter responding to the Touhy request from the Epstein victim. The Maxwell team is okay with this version of the letter. Please let me know if this is what you had in mind, or happy to discuss/change things if not.¶
Thanks,¶
Steven¶
| From: | Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) |
| Sent: | Sunday, July 26, 2020 10:10 PM |
| To: | McEnany, John (USANYS) < |