Subject: Re: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833¶
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:21:40 +0000¶
Great. Thank you for the quick turnaround!¶
No issues from the Tartaglione team. Thanks,¶
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 7:14 PM¶
Subject: Re: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833¶
For Tartaglione there are not, but there are records showing Epstein attorney visits in there.¶
On Jan 7, 2021, at 7:05 PM,¶
Hey - I will look now, but first, can you confirm there are no visit logs or count slops reflecting attorney visits in here?¶
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 7:04 PM¶
Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833¶
Before greenlighting the Epstein FOIA production tomorrow, I wanted to make sure that you were okay with the 26 pages BOP sent yesterday (attached) from the Tartaglione perspective. I think the only mentions of Tartaglione are on the last two pages, where his name is on a SHU roster and redacted. I assume no issues from the Tartaglione team, but please let me know. Thanks and sorry for the tight turnaround here.¶
Thanks,¶
Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 All.¶
Following up on the below: for some reason,¶
EFTA00102012¶
please note that I segregated in separate folders the attorney and social visit log pages in the production version and the attorney and social visit log pages and the count slips in the translucent version—no count slips in the production version because they are withheld in full.)¶
Please let me know if you have any issues with these new pages, or with the production version (which, to be clear, should just be the pages in the translucent version that are not withheld in full, with the green no longer translucent). This has to be produced by Friday so, if possible, please let me know of any questions or concerns by eod tomorrow (Thursday).¶
Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833¶
translucent pages for review (they sent a final count of pages that does not line up with what we have). I am following up with them¶
on short notice before the production on Friday. I will follow up once I have more information from BOP about the discrepancies here.¶
redacted to show Epstein’s name (similar to the census roster discussion below). Please let me know if you have any concerns.¶
EFTA00102013¶