Email thread about a Telegraph story on Prince Andrew interview, March 2020

Yes. They just copied the Telegraph. They never called.¶

On Mar 14, 2020, at 5:57 PM,

¶

Ok. Possibly a call to the post reporter as well.

¶

On Mar 14, 2020, at 5:50 PM,

¶

Sorry for late reply. Was driving up to Vermont and back to pick up at school. Didn’t want him sitting on an Amtrak train for hours when it’s by car.

¶

This Telegraph abomination was I, quoted wrongly and contra the ground rules. I will call this awful woman Monday to gripe, probably to no avail, and that will be the last time I ever engage with her.

¶

And the tenor of the story is flagrantly misleading. She asked how one can know the prince won’t agree to be interviewed if there’s been no communication. I told her off the record (or possibly this part was on background, but in any event not with the understanding that it would have quotation marks around it) that our office contacted his lawyers, and they responded us there would be no interview, that it wasn’t the case that we’re still waiting to find out if they even received our inquiry. Based on that, she says ‘Andrew’s lawyers have been in communication with the office’ or however she phrased it, and says that’s different from what you said. As if there is ongoing dialog, ongoing negotiations or something, which is absolutely not what I said.

¶

Tuesday will mark 24 years for me doing law enforcement public affairs, between the FBI and here, and I should know better than to even try to talk to a British tabloid.

¶

| EFTA00095955 | | :--- | :--- |¶

This is a simple Markdown document with no headings or paragraphs. It contains just one line of text.¶

On Mar 14, 2020, at 12:07 AM,

¶

Did anyone talk to the telegraph?

¶

https://pagesix.com/2020/03/13/prince-andrew-reportedly-now-cooperating-with-jeffrey-epstein-investigators/

¶

EFTA00095956¶