Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · April 2020

Whistleblower emails alleging SEC misconduct in Gibraltar covered action, April 2020

A whistleblower's forwarded emails appealing denial of an SEC award, alleging SEC fraud on the Gibraltar court and mishandled whistleblower information.Machine-written summary

EFTA00094171

www.sec.gov

(i) Sole power to vote or to direct the vote . The information required by Item 4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person.

www.sec.gov

MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol

But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol

As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting?

AND, per my extensive correspondence with the SEC re my TCR’s: The SEC is ALSO grossly under estimating the criminal activity in NITE/Magna/NewLead

SEC: Criminals bailing out/actively facilitating criminals/criminal activity.

soliciting/using whistleblower information in unethical/illegal manner to bring complaints/obstruct

complaints/deny whistleblower rightful compensation.

Cheers!

Christopher J Dilorio

Whistleblower

From: Chris Dilorio <

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 6:43 AM

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix

More evidence of SEC fraud on the court in Gibraltar.

It is CLEAR that the Opco AML Covered Action 2015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d’Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my information. However, the SEC Opco complaint even stops short of a thorough investigation of the ENTIRETY of the FINRA trading activity. WHY? WHY didn’t the SEC Opco/Gibraltar complaint go into trading activity in the FINRA AML OTCM shells through 2014 as FINCEN did? WHY did the SEC omit MATERIAL information to the court in Gibraltar causing a “significant under estimating” of criminal activity? The SEC knows who the accounts were. The SEC knows who the executing BD’s/MM’s were. The SEC committed a fraud on the court in Gibraltar.

Gibraltar was ROLLING OUT NEW OTCM services into the end of 2011.

https://www.pr.com/press-release/355246

Gibraltar Global Securities Now Offering Offshore Brokerage Accounts - PR.com

EFTA00094172

Nassau, Bahamas, The, September 22, 2011 —()— Gibraltar Global Securities is now offering offshore brokerage accounts in addition to their broad array of financial services.Gibraltar Global …

www.pr.com

https://www.pr.com/press-release/355247

GGSI Bahamas is Now Offering Pink Sheet Clearance

Offshore Broker Adds to Buying and Selling Services

www.pr.com

https://www.pr.com/press-release/369649

GGSI Bahamas Provides State-of-the-Art Security for OTC PINK Transactions and Communication

GGSI (Gibraltar Global Securities Inc.) has just announced the release of their latest security measures designed to protect their client’s personal data, and to secure electronic communication.

www.pr.com

The SEC KNEW the Gibraltar/Opco trading activity went well beyond 2011 YET cut off its investigation at “well into 2010”. Thus, KNOWINGLY omitting material information in Gibraltar: FRAUD ON THE COURT.

Confirming my allegations of SEC criminal activity in handling my information. WHY? to protect NITE and UBSS. 2 criminal entities bailed out by the SEC.

Now, the SEC is using the completely fabricated reason for denying my award claim for covered action 2015-016: “The investigators never saw the claimants information”.

WHEN the explicit and exclusive responsibility to distribute whistleblower information within the SEC falls on the OWB itself.

More criminal activity.

Criminals bailing out criminals while denying Whistleblowers due process and compensation.

Cheers!

Christopher J Dilorio

Whistleblower

From: Chris Dilorio <

Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 9:36 AM

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix