Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · May 2, 2021

Email on withholding the July 23 jail video in Epstein FOIA, May 2021

Subject:RE: Emails re preservation in Epstein FOIA
Date:Sun, 02 May 2021 17:30:56 +0000

I can imagine a broad theory for why we’d withhold this, but the reason and I didn’t mark it is because (a) the request for the 7/23 video came from the Tartaglione team (originating from defense lawyer); and (b) I can’t imagine any scenario where we’d ever use this video. You may have seen other docs we withheld relating to the video capture, and those documents we marked as “withhold” because they relate to video of the August 9/10 timeframe.

There were some emails about the preservation of the 07/23 video that were not specifically identified in your comments, but to be consistent we are withholding them in full under Noel as well. Please let me know if this is not right. They are attached here.

Thanks,

Assistant United States Attorney

EFTA00094115

Email on withholding the July 23 jail video in Epstein FOIA, May 2021

Emails and letters

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · May 2, 2021

<table border="1" <tr <td Subject:</td <td RE: Emails re preservation in Epstein FOIA</td </tr <tr <td Date:</td <td Sun, 02 May 2021 17:30:56 +0000</td </tr </table I can imagine a broad theory for why we’d withhold this, but the reason and I didn’t mark it is because (a) the request for the 7/23 video came from the Tartaglione team (originating from defense lawyer); and (b) I can’t imagine any scenario where we’d ever use this video. You may have seen other docs we withheld relating to the video capture, and those documents we marked as “withhold” because they relate to video of the August 9…