Subject: RE: meetings?¶
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:42:02 +0000¶
Ok, that plan sounds fine. My only thought is on timing: it’s up to you, but given everything that’s going on (particularly the superseder), it might make more sense to schedule these interviews for after the superseder GJ date.¶
Subject: FW: meetings?¶
See below. Given the allegations about other men, I think we should interview these women. Would 3/17 work for others? If it works for and/or, I’m thinking these could be good interviews to let sit in on so that he can see how we conduct victim interviews and hear directly from some witnesses about what Epstein’s world was like (but let me know if anyone disagrees). / , you’d be welcome, but I don’t think we need the whole team on for these.¶
From: Mariann Wang <¶
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 12:55 PM¶
Subject: meetings?¶
Hi :¶
I just wanted to follow up on our call last week to see if your team felt the need/desire to have a supplemental meeting with .¶
And separately, we wondered if you would be able to make time to talk to 2 other new clients, who would like to be sure you have their information for your investigation. The basic info for these two women, who are¶
is as follows:¶
Client 1¶
Abuse occurred approximately 2008-2012, when she was 18-22.¶
Abused in New York and Palm Beach (including at his office while he was sleeping in jail).¶
<Trafficked to 6-7 other men.¶
Client 2¶
-Abuse occurred approximately 2002-03 and 2008-09, when she was 22-23, and 28-29.¶
Abused in New York, Palm Beach, and Sao Paulo, Brazil.¶
Trafficked to at least two other men¶
In terms of our schedule, if late afternoon March 17 (say from 3PM EST) would work for you, that would work for us. And of course, if that doesn’t, just let us know what dates/times would and we will figure it out.¶
EFTA00091003¶
Thank you,¶
Mariann¶
Cuti Hecker Wang LLP¶
EFTA00091004¶