Marc,¶
That would be fine, thanks. We can call a conference number or one of your desk lines, whatever you prefer.¶
thanks,¶
From: Weinstein, Marc A. ¶
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 19:36¶
Cc: andrew.tomback@whitecase.com;¶
Subject: Re: US v Epstein (Civil Forfeiture Matter)¶
Would your team be available on Wednesday at 2:30pm to discuss this and follow up to our last call?¶
Thanks¶
Marc¶
Marc A. Weinstein | Partner¶
Co-Chair, White Collar Defense¶
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP¶
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard copy version.¶
On Oct 18, 2019, at 11:54 PM,¶
CAUTION: This email was sent by someone outside of the Firm.¶
Marc, Andrew,¶
Thank you for speaking with us yesterday, and as discussed we’re glad to have the lines of communication open. As we mentioned, we also appreciate you respectively accepting service of process for Mr. Kahn and Mr. Indyke. I have attached both here, but please let me know if either or both of you would prefer to receive process separately. (And we can discuss if there are privilege issues with respect to Mr. Indyke in particular.)¶
EFTA00088994¶
Additionally, we understand from having spoken with certain victim counsel since our conversation yesterday that they have been told by Bennet Moskowitz that Mr. Moskowitz represents the Epstein estate (and also that discussions between Mr. Moskowitz and at least some victim counsel may have already effectively broken down). Would it be necessary or productive for us to have a call that included Mr. Moskowitz as well, or otherwise could you clarify his role—including whether victim counsel should be communicating with you both or Mr. Moskowitz in the first instance? Happy to discuss any of this in real time if that would be useful.¶
Thanks again, and looking forward to being in touch.¶
Marc,¶
The team has a combination of travel and other obligations this evening, but I f you could please let us know a couple times (or ranges) that work for you tomorrow, we should be able to set a time for then.¶