Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence

DOJ attaché email on MLA witness questions and Prince Andrew press story

Justice Department attaché in London discusses mutual legal assistance questions about a material witness and concerns over a story about Prince Andrew not cooperating with Epstein investigatorsMachine-written summary

We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you.

  1. Has the witness consented to the release of the information requested? If so, please a copy of the written consent.

The witness has not been asked for written consent. However, counsel for the witness has encouraged the prosecutors to seek this information. In can be inferred from the statements of counsel that the witness has consented.

  1. did the witness apply to and what was the year of her application/attendance?

The team was uncertain of which college (I had asked this). Is there a central office at which can be queried for all colleges?

  1. How, if at all does this request relate to/impact the material witness MLA request?

This request relates to the charged Maxwell case going to trial. The material witness MLA requests relates to a broader investigation.

  1. What were the sentences which applied at the date of the offences(1994-2004),as the penalties provided with the request apply to conduct that occurred after 27 July 2006?

I will check with the case team to confirm specific periods. The sentences will be greater than one year and less than life (with no death penalty involved), so is there a need to be more precise?

EFTA00088140

Subject: FW: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators ‘straining relations between UK and America’

You guys have a moment for a brief call this morning? The Ambassador is concerned about the attached story, and I wanted to see if you have any sense of where this is coming from. Is this coming from victims’ counsel? Anyone in your shop decided to push this?

The quote from the State Department yesterday in the NY Times was unhelpful (and I let them know it – I think it came from someone spouting off on the European Desk).

I also had the following email from the UKCA yesterday:

We are aware that a civil case has been filed in New York concerning the Epstein investigation with the material witness as the defendant. Please can you let us know what impact this has on the material witness’s current status, as a witness, in the criminal investigation and in relation to the MLA request.

I think they are asking whether, in light of the recent allegations, is now a suspect instead of a witness (in British parlance). I was going to respond with one word “none” but thought I should check first.

I am around today whenever you can chat. The earlier the better because the Amb is keen to sort this out.

Thanks,

U.S. Department of Justice Attaché - London

DOJ attaché email on MLA witness questions and Prince Andrew press story

Emails and letters

Justice Department attaché in London discusses mutual legal assistance questions about a material witness and concerns over a story about Prince Andrew not cooperating with Epstein investigators

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9

We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. 1. Has the witness consented to the release of the information requested? If so, please a copy of the written consent. The witness has not been asked for written consent. However, counsel for the witness has encouraged the prosecutors to seek this information. In can be inferred from the statements of counsel that the witness has consented. 2. did the witness apply to and what was the year of her application/attendance? The team was uncertain of which co…