Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 12, 2020

Correspondence, 2020-03-12

Email exchange in which counsel an attorney shares a draft factual statement and argues a vulnerable cog in Epstein's operation deserves non-prosecution.Machine-written summary

EFTA00087849

Susan R. Necheles

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 12, 2020, at 8:49 PM, wrote:

Confirming receipt, thanks.

Submission on behalf of

<image001.jpg>

Attached is a draft of the factual statement, just so that you can better understand the facts that we are presenting.

We feel that given abuse, and given the fact that we see her basically as a cog in Epstein’s wheel, acting entirely at his direction and doing what she did at a time that she herself was a very vulnerable victim, a non-pros would be the appropriate disposition. But we want to discuss this with you before we finalize this and make a submission.

Thanks, Susan

Open in Docs

Google Docs: Create and edit documents online.

Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

You have received this email because someone shared a document with you from Google Docs.

EFTA00087850