From:¶
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation (¶
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:06:57 +0000¶
Thanks. 4:30 is fine. You can call my des¶
Brendan F. Quigley [bio]¶
Partner¶
Baker Botts L.L.P.¶
From:¶
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 4:01 PM¶
To: Quigley, Brendan¶
Cc:|¶
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation¶
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]¶
Thanks very much. If 4:30 works, I can call you then. Which number is best to reach you?¶
From: Quigley, Brendan¶
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 3:32 PM¶
To¶
Cc|¶
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation (Rodgers)¶
Sure. I am around the rest of the afternoon today. Tomorrow is a bit rougher, but I could talk first thing (like 9) or late afternoon.¶
Brendan F. Quigley [bio]¶
Partner¶
Baker Botts L.L.P.¶
From:¶
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 12:48 PM¶
To¶
Cd¶
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation¶
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]¶
Hi Brendan,¶
EFTA00085166¶
Hope you’re doing well. Do you have time this afternoon or tomorrow for a quick call about this case?¶
Thanks,¶
Appreciate the courtesy. Please do not pass on our contact info. That said, feel free to contact us if anything comes up in your investigation.¶
Thank you. Hope you guys are all hanging in okay.¶
Brendan F. Quigley¶
On Jun 5, 2020, at 3:19 PM,¶
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]¶
Brendan,¶
An attorney for an individual who has an active civil case in connection with Epstein has reached out to us to ask if we know the current counsel for Mr. . I assume that the attorney is seeking to serve a request or subpoena for documents and/or testimony, though we haven’t asked specifically.¶
I don’t think we ordinarily engage on that type of question, but given that we have been in touch with you in connection with our interview of Mr. , if you’d like we can pass along your contact info, so that the attorney goes to you rather than attempting to contact or serve Mr. Rogers directly. And if not, of course no problem, and we’ll just let him know that we’re not able to comment one way or the other on the status of any counsel. Whatever you prefer.¶
Thanks, and hope you’re well these days.¶