Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Nov. 22, 2021

Correspondence, 2021-11-22

Email exchange in which SDNY prosecutors and plaintiff's counsel discuss the defendant's response to motions to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena.Machine-written summary

Hi Sabina,

The Court has already ruled – order attached.

Thanks,

Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Maxwell response re 17(c) subpoena

Thanks, Are we entitled to a reply, and if so, what is the timing?

Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 7:27 PM

To: Sigrid McCawley <

Subject: Maxwell response re 17(c) subpoena

Sigrid, Sabina,

Attached is Maxwell’s response to the motions to quash her Rule 17 subpoena.

Thanks,

Assistant United States Attorney

Southern District of New York

New York, New York 10007

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1 08201831BSF]

EFTA00082201

Correspondence, 2021-11-22

Emails and letters

Email exchange in which SDNY prosecutors and plaintiff's counsel discuss the defendant's response to motions to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Nov. 22, 2021

Hi Sabina, The Court has already ruled – order attached. Thanks, Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Maxwell response re 17(c) subpoena Thanks, Are we entitled to a reply, and if so, what is the timing? Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 7:27 PM To: Sigrid McCawley < Subject: Maxwell response re 17(c) subpoena Sigrid, Sabina, Attached is Maxwell’s response to the motions to quash her Rule 17 subpoena. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the …