Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 2020

Prosecutor emails to defense counsel an attorney about a client proffer, 2020

Email chain between prosecutors and defense attorney an attorney discussing attorney proffers and arranging a voluntary interview with his client, March 2020.Machine-written summary

in DC on biz. Get back to u soon

Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation.

https://www.actl.com/

NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice.

On Mar 3, 2020, at 6:15 PM,

wrote:

Michael,

Wanted to get back to you, as promised – as we indicated previously, the attorney proffers we’ve received from you haven’t caused us to change our view of Ms. status, and I think you’ve generally addressed the initial and follow-up questions we’ve had. I think from our perspective the next step would be to have a conversation with Ms. directly, and to cover with her the same topics that we’ve addressed with you. Ordinarily we would approach a discussion like that simply by going chronologically, and asking follow-up questions as appropriate along the way, but as I’ve mentioned to you previously, if it would be useful to proceed in a different format, or to focus (or avoid) specific topics in a first meeting, I think we would generally be amenable to that. And of course as we’ve also discussed, any discussion would be completely voluntary—not just the interview overall, but any specific topic or question that she wanted to pass on, or discuss with you in the moment, etc., would be totally up to her. Please let us know what you think? We’re also happy to chat via phone if that would be helpful as well.

EFTA00081824

Michael,

Received, thank you. This information is helpful, and as with the prior attorney proffer, does not cause us to change our view of Ms. status.

We will be traveling most of this upcoming week, but I hope that we will be able to follow up with you the following week to discuss possible next steps.

thank you,

From: Michael Bachner

Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 10:45

Subject: RE: Attorney Proffer

pls see attached replies to your questions.

From: Michael Bachner

Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 12:01

Subject: RE: Attorney Proffer

Good morning. was away over the weekend. I expect to have a reply to your questions by tomorrow.

Prosecutor emails to defense counsel an attorney about a client proffer, 2020

Emails and letters

Email chain between prosecutors and defense attorney an attorney discussing attorney proffers and arranging a voluntary interview with his client, March 2020.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · March 2020

in DC on biz. Get back to u soon Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error,…