Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · April 29, 2020

Correspondence, 2020-04-29

EFTA00079686

From: Chris Dilorio <

Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 8:03 AM

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix

The SMOKING GUN in my allegations:

Naked shorting in CGFIA (My TCR/FINRA complaint) by “un named third party BD” in 2013. Well known to the SEC. This is why there was no investigation into the ENTIREY of the FINRA trading activity. The SEC issued waivers to Opco within days of its AML complaint. WHO was the SEC protecting? WHO were the customers and executing BD’s/MM’s in the Opco complaint? ALSO well known to the SEC: MY INFORMATION. 5 years to get a preliminary denial: statute of limitations. BUT the last overt act of this ongoing conspiracy has not yet occurred.

Chris

From: Chris Dilorio <

Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 7:56 AM

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix

Still more evidence of a well orchestrated scheme to cover up and obstruct a FULL SEC investigation into Opco/Gibraltar/NITE/UBSS trading activity in billions of shares of OTCM money laundering shells. The SEC used my information to bring AND obstruct complaints.

The 2 SEC Commissioners dissent in granting Oppenheimer waivers after this egregious activity https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/dissenting-statement-oppenheimer-inc.html

SEC.gov | Dissenting Statement In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

Dissenting Statement In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., by Commissioner Luis A. Aguilar and Commissioner Kara M. Stein, February 4, 2015

www.sec.gov

In fact, the SEC waivers came within days of their complaint. Here, these 2 Commissioners cite Oppenheimer trading “BILLIONS of shares of penny stocks”. Clearly, they were not JUST referencing the SEC Gibraltar complaint. WHO was the SEC protecting with its complaint then waivers?

The smoking gun which I have provided to the SEC on several e mails:

Which came in an SEC reviewed CGFIA 10Q

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1344394/000135448814000425/cgfi_10q.htm