Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to¶
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:46:48 +0000¶
Great, thanks. I’m free all day aside from that witness interview at 5. Thanks.¶
-----Original Message-----¶
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 10:33 AM¶
Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to¶
27th is fine with me. What time works for you?¶
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 10:04 AM¶
Subject: Re: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to¶
I’m traveling to Bogota that day, so I don’t think I can make the 28th work. I think in her initial email she said she was free on the 27th too?¶
Sent from my iPhone¶
On Aug 19, 2019, at 9:43 AM,
¶
I’m wide open on 8/28. What time works for you?
¶
Subject: Re: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019
¶
Yes. That’s fine. What time would be best for you? Thanks.
¶
Suzanne Jaffe Bloom
¶
Partner
¶
Winston & Strawn LLP
¶
x-apple-data-detectors://2/1x-apple-data-detectors://4/1200 Park Avenuex-apple-data-detectors://0/1
¶
New York, NY 10166-4193x-apple-data-detectors://0/1
¶
EFTA00079044¶
Suzanne,
¶
I think it’s unlikely the trial will be quite that brief, but if you’re not available later that week, we can schedule it for the 28th and at least one or both of and will be able to attend. Would you be able to do late afternoon?
¶
thanks,
¶
-----Original Message-----
¶
- Thank you for your prompt response. We will advise our client accordingly.
As for scheduling, can we plan for August 28 with the hope that your trial will be over by then (or perhaps will be in jury deliberations such that you can get away for a meeting)? If it turns out that your trial isn’t over by then, perhaps we can still meet with and that day. Please let us know if that would work.
¶
Many thanks,
¶
Suzanne
¶
Suzanne,
¶
First, and most importantly, to the extent your client or any of her family, friends, loved ones, etc., feel threatened by any communications or other actions, they should not hesitate to immediately report that to authorities, whether local police, the local FBI office, and/or any other appropriate law enforcement. If your client or anyone else believes at any time that they may be in imminent danger, they should immediately call 911. Their reporting threats to authorities will not interfere with or otherwise impact our investigation and we in no way want to impede any legal steps they wish to take to ensure their safety. Please let us know if you have any questions about this at all, as we do not want there to be any confusion or miscommunication about the importance of individuals being able to ensure their safety.
¶
EFTA00079045¶
Regarding a follow-up meeting, I unfortunately have a short trial starting August 26. Would it be possible to meet sometime this coming week, rather than the following? I expect we also could make ourselves available on a weekend day if that would be helpful, or we could set a time later in the week of the 26th. Or if none of that works, please let us know and we’ll further confer internally about options.
¶
Thanks for your time on the phone yesterday. Please let us know if you are available to meet on Monday, August 26, or Tuesday, August 27, to continue our discussions and attorney proffer.
¶
Also, I know you had limited time yesterday (and apologies for going over my initial estimate for the call), but one of the things I had intended to share with you are some of the threatening communications that have been received by husband. Attached is an example of a recent one. We don’t want to do anything that may impact your ongoing investigation, so defer to you as to what should be done with respect to this.
¶
Thanks and we look forward to hearing from you as to your availability for a meeting.
¶
Best,
¶
Suzanne
¶
Suzanne Jaffe Bloom
¶
Partner
¶
Winston & Strawn LLP
¶
Biohttp://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/bloom-suzanne-jaffe.html
¶
VCardhttp://www.winston.com/vcards/1022.vcf | Emailmailto:¶
winston.comhttp://winston.comhttp://www.winston.com¶
EFTA00079046¶
EFTA00079047¶
Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to
¶
Suzanne,
¶
We have obligations at 3:00, so if you think our conversation is likely to take 20 minutes or less, we can do 2:30, otherwise to give ourselves sufficient time we would prefer to do anytime 5:00 or later tomorrow or anytime at all on Thursday.
¶
thanks,
¶
Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to¶
Can we do 2:30?
¶
Suzanne Jaffe Bloom
¶
Partner
¶
Biohttp://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/bloom-suzanne-jaffe.html
¶
winston.comhttp://winston.comhttp://www.winston.com¶
Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to
¶
EFTA00079048¶
Suzanne,
¶
Unfortunately we’re a little over-scheduled tomorrow – we could do 2:00 tomorrow, or after 5:00.
¶
Alternatively, we could do any time on Thursday. What would you prefer?¶
Are you available for a call tomorrow at 12:45? If so, we will send a dial in. Many thanks.
¶
Suzanne Jaffe Bloom
¶
EFTA00079049¶
Biohttp://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/bloom-suzanne-jaffe.html
¶
VCardhttp://www.winston.com/vcards/1022.vcf | Emailmailto:¶
winston.comhttp://winston.comhttp://www.winston.com/¶
We should all be around, but for convenience you can have security let me know when you arrive. Looking forward to speaking with you both at 9:30 tomorrow.
¶
I am writing to confirm our meeting with you tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. Whom should we ask for when we arrive?
¶
Thank you,
¶
Johanna
¶
Johanna Rae Hudgens
¶
Associate Attorney
¶
Winston & Strawn LL
¶
Pronouns: she, her, hers
¶
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
¶
|¶