Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Oct. 8, 2021

Email thread with Sigrid McCawley on pro bono representation in Epstein matters

October 2021 email thread in which attorney Sigrid McCawley discusses her pro bono representation and refers to counsel handling a related unsealing matter.Machine-written summary

Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Call

Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:26:09 +0000

Inline-Images: image001.png

I’m unfortunately traveling today so I don’t have great access to old emails, but it looks like I forwarded an email from him on 4/20/21 to the full team (same day he emailed me) and I responded that was handling (I can’t tell if she copied anyone on that response). He also emailed about three weeks after that, basically identical email, and I unfortunately can’t tell if I forwarded that one as well, or if anybody else was copied, but my guess is that I thought it was being handled already based on the prior recent exchange.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 8, 2021, at 09:34,

wrote:

This attorney tells me he has been emailing you over the past months and has not heard back. Have you heard anything from him?

From: Sigrid McCawley smccawley@bsfllp.com

Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 1:04 PM

To:

Cc: |

Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Call

Hi, I do still represent pro bono on the Epstein related matters but she also has Bob Lewis who is helping her on the v. Maxwell unsealing/protective order issues because I represent in that case. His contact info is below. Thanks.

Robert Y. Lewis

The Marsh Law Firm PLLC

Cell: 618-743-2000

Direct

<image001.png>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information

Sigrid McCawley

Partner

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200

Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33301

(t) +1 954 377 4223

(m)+1 954 770 5377

smccawley@bsfllp.com

www.hsfllp.com

EFTA00077889

From:

Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 10:25 AM

To: Sigrid McCawley smccawley@bsfllp.com

Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Call

Hi Sigrid,

Following up on our conversation yesterday, are you able to connect us with the attorney who represents

Thanks,

On Oct 6, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Sigrid McCawley

Can I give you a call now? What number should I call?

Partner

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

smccawley@bsflip.com

www.bsfllp.com

From:

Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 12:43 PM

To: Sigrid McCawley smccawley@bsfllp.com;

To: Sigrid McCawley smccawley@bsfllp.com;

Subject: RE: Call

Hi Sigrid,

We’re free until 2:30 today, if there’s a time that works for you. Thanks!

From: Sigrid McCawley smccawley@bsflp.com

Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 11:56 AM

To:

Subject: [EXTERNAL] Call

Can we have a quick call when you have a moment?

Thanks

Sigrid

Sigrid McCawley

Partner

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

EFTA00077890

www.bsfllp.com

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1 08201831BSF]

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1 08201831BSF]

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1 08201831BSF]

EFTA00077891

Email thread with Sigrid McCawley on pro bono representation in Epstein matters

Emails and letters

October 2021 email thread in which attorney Sigrid McCawley discusses her pro bono representation and refers to counsel handling a related unsealing matter.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Oct. 8, 2021

Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Call Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:26:09 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png I’m unfortunately traveling today so I don’t have great access to old emails, but it looks like I forwarded an email from him on 4/20/21 to the full team (same day he emailed me) and I responded that was handling (I can’t tell if she copied anyone on that response). He also emailed about three weeks after that, basically identical email, and I unfortunately can’t tell if I forwarded that one as well, or if anybody else was copied, but my guess is that I thought it was being handled already based …