Correspondence · Jan. 15, 2016

Second Circuit clerk emails refusing further contact with a prolific filer, 2016

Second Circuit clerk's office emails advising a frequent correspondent that court communications by email are improper and no further responses will be sent.Machine-written summary

EFTA00075947¶

Dear Mr. Dean: Thomson Reuters News¶

Do you accept stories about court corruption at Thomson Reuters News?¶

Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:16 AM¶

To: Richard C Curtiss¶

Subject: Re: Supreme Court Submission: Judicial Conduct¶

Good morning -¶

I’ve been in touch with the marshals this morning and forwarded to the recent emails. She suspects Mr. Curtiss may have switched email addresses because the IT folks previously blocked a number of his addresses. If there are updates, I’ll pass them along.¶

Have a good day.¶

Clerk of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals¶

From:¶

Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:59 AM¶

Subject: Re: Electronic Filling, Western District of New York¶

Dear Mr. Curtiss –¶

On behalf of all the recipients of your recent emails, I am writing to advise you that no responses will be sent to you.¶

Email is an inappropriate way to communicate with the Court. The proceedings you commence must be determined in the ordinary course, not by way of improper communications.¶

Sincerely,¶

EFTA00075948¶

Clerk of Court¶

U. S. Court of Appeals¶

Second Circuit¶

Agency Appeals¶

agencycases@ca2.uscourts.gov ¶

212-857-8544¶

Attorney Admissions¶

admissions@ca2.uscourts.gov ¶

212-857-8603

212-857-8640