Makes sense on both, and thanks.¶
Subject: Re: 302s / interview notes¶
Hope you all had a nice weekend!¶
I won’t be in the office until later this week so I’ll double check on these for you. I don’t believe there are notes for but will double check. As for , that one is puzzling. The pdf is coming up that it is associated to the Miami case file but giving a 2018 date. I can say that neither or I wrote it. Could be a glitch but I will look into that a little more. I’ll get back to you on this.¶
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes¶
thanks very much for helping us to track all of this stuff down! We’ve reviewed our records and I think are down to questions on just two, where we have 302s (attached) but not underlying notes:¶
The one is a little puzzling – we have a 302 and notes from when we met with in October 2019, and before that the prior FBI interviews with were in 2006 and 2007 – but neither of those 302s include the info in the attached report, which has the date of 12/04/18 … but that could just be the date generated in the report when it got called up in your system, there’s no date in the actual text. I don’t recall us interviewing in 2018, but I could be wrong! Anyway let us know what you think.¶
And for , it was a quick interview at his office so there may not be retained notes, but just double-checking.¶
Thanks again and have a good weekend!¶
EFTA00074684¶
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes¶
This is really helpful, and I think we’re down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications –¶
For ), I don’t think we received notes from 7/6/19 – the attachments included a copy of ID but not any writing. It’s possible there weren’t other written notes – the 302, attached, is very short – but just let us know either way?¶
Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for are just the short contact info notes, with attorney info and a property invoice – both the notes and the 302 are attached for reference. I think that’s right but just want to confirm.¶
I also didn’t see notes for though let us know if it’s in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, that’s also totally possible.¶
And just a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as “___ interview,” which I assume is ? It also has the name “” (?) at the top, which may be where that confusion comes from – I know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc.¶
Also totally happy to chat via phone if that’s easiest to run through these. Thanks again!¶
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes¶