Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · May 22, 2020

Email exchange tracking missing FBI 302 interview notes, May 2020

Email thread between government and other counsel coordinating which FBI 302 interview notes are missing and exchanging attachments for remaining interviewsMachine-written summary

Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:08:08 +0000

Got it, thanks.

Subject: Re: 302s / interview notes

That was a typo. It’s just the two.

On May 22, 2020, at 2:45 PM,

You said three missing but listed two – is it just and , or one more?

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 08:23

Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes

The spreadsheet is updated with everything in email. In terms of notes, the only three that are missing/not been covered are the following:

For ease of reference, I’ve attached the corresponding 302s for each of these interviews.

Apart from that, we appear to be all covered in terms of 302s/notes.

Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes

Ok sorry for the delay.

EFTA00074676

Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes

This is really helpful, and I think we’re down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications –

For ), I don’t think we received notes from 7/6/19 – the attachments included a copy of ID but not any writing. It’s possible there weren’t other written notes – the 302, attached, is very short – but just let us know either way?

Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for are just the short contact info notes, with attorney info and a property invoice – both the notes and the 302 are attached for reference. I think that’s right but just want to confirm.

I also didn’t see notes for though let us know if it’s in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, that’s also totally possible.

And just a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as “___” which I assume is ? It also has the name “” (?) at the top, which may be where that confusion comes from – I know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc.

Also totally happy to chat via phone if that’s easiest to run through these. Thanks again!

Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes

Hi all,

I’ve attached the notes you’ve requested. I’ve also attached 302 and notes; that interview was not in the batch we gave you. You’ll see below where I’ve typed “attached” to reflect what notes we have. Interviews where this is not written simply meant there were no notes to attach likely because the interview/contact was brief (I double checked all to be sure). Let me know if there is anything else you come across that we’ve missed sending.

Also, could you send over the notes from the last two phone interviews with and Just want to make sure we have them on our end.

Email exchange tracking missing FBI 302 interview notes, May 2020

Emails and letters

Email thread between government and other counsel coordinating which FBI 302 interview notes are missing and exchanging attachments for remaining interviews

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · May 22, 2020

Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:08:08 +0000 Got it, thanks. Subject: Re: 302s / interview notes That was a typo. It’s just the two. On May 22, 2020, at 2:45 PM, You said three missing but listed two – is it just and , or one more? Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 08:23 Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes The spreadsheet is updated with everything in email. In terms of notes, the only three that are missing/not been covered are the following: For ease of reference, I’ve attached the corresponding 302s for each of these interviews. Apart from that, we appear to be all covered in terms of 302s/notes. Subject…