EFTA00070244¶
Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix¶
Judge Oetken et al,¶
No wonder why the SEC settled so quickly with Arena and Bradley: Parallax.¶
I left out 1 selling shareholder from the thoroughly reviewed Parallax June 2019 S1¶
Lincoln I Pace¶
Arizona Dentist¶
Lincoln I Pace DDS - Book Appointment Online, View Reviews, Timings | DentalInsider.com¶
EFTA00070245¶
Patients Love Lincoln I Pace, DDS - A Top-Rated Dentist on Dental Insider¶
Each day, thousands of patients rely on our comprehensive dentist profiles and reviews to find dental professionals providing the highest level of care.¶
Judge Oetken,¶
I have attached my IRS TCR filed with Berger Montague. The IRS TCR was based on the SEC TCR. It was WHY IRS CI agents Vikas Arora and Nate Sarnacki flew to Denver from Chicago in April 2016 to meet with me. Berger submitted my IRS TCR shortly after submitting my SEC TCR in March 2013. As you can clearly see and as the record of extensive correspondence (including IG Hoecker) clearly shows: the SEC/FINRA/FINCEN UBS AML complaint for which Norberg,Pasquinelli,Knowles,Wardlay issued their fraud denial WHILE I was still waiting for my Opco Denial appeal: The Opco trading data ALSO implicates UBS as well as NITE: SEC OWB/IG Hoecker FRAUD: “Enforcement staff never saw Mr Dilorio’s information” FinCEN Assesses $14.5 Million Penalty against UBS Financial Services for Anti-Money Laundering Failures | FinCEN.gov¶
FinCEN Assesses $14.5 Million Penalty against UBS Financial Services for Anti-Money Laundering Failures | FinCEN.gov¶
WASHINGTON—The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) today announced an assessment against UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBSFS) for willful violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).. FinCEN assessed a $14.5 million civil money penalty, of which $5 million will be paid to the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the remainder will be concurrent with penalties for similar or related …¶
The blatant, and egregious disregard by NITE/UBSS at al in trading billions of shares of sham companies with no products, nothing but losses, reverse merger,repeat explained: illegal naked shorting facilitates ALL of it. Very profitable. Virtually riskless. Further, as I ask in my information: WHEN would NITE,UBSS, CDEL etc file a SAR? BEFORE or AFTER trading billions of shares???? There ARE NO SAR’s. This also would fall under the jurisdiction of Kevin Goodman. This is the IRS TCR: money laundering/tax evasion related to this illegal naked shorting. In it, I discuss the Economic Substance Theory. WHY do sophisticated investors like the ones I have detailed extensively bother “investing” in these sham companies?? Take Mr Goodman’s et al Parallax “Covid complaint” and the OTHER sham shells I detail below. In fact, take the SEC OWN WORDS in the Parallax complaint: Parallax had no products AND no money in Early 2020 when Arena/Bradly made their bogus claims. What did they have? The same thing I detail in my extensive correspondence: ALL of these money laundering shells have worthless certificates. Usually converted from bogus, fictitious promissory notes. Then dumped on the public by a WILLING executing BD/MM like NITE,UBSS,CDEL etc. AND, converted into real money. The BD/MM are compensated in the form of illegal naked shorting trading profits. This is and always has been the core business at NITE et al. Unfortunately: the effects of which are sitting on the NITE balance sheet as we speak. This is why my claims have been criminally obstructed by the SEC. The SEC has REPEATEDLY bailed out a known criminal enterprise. This is why Goodman produced the bullshit “order handling” complaint almost 6 months¶
EFTA00070246¶
after I sent him my TCR in July 2015. This is why ALL of the related entities are omitted in his Parallax complaint. The SEC admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them.¶
In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader?¶
To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax S1: June 2019 with sellers I detailed below. Yet, in early 2020, the SEC acknowledges Parallax had no money to support their “new product” claims. HOW CAN THIS BE? As with hundreds of money laundering shells/NITE/UBSS et al top traded: These sophisticated investors are NOT “investing”. They are LAUNDERING.¶
And with bullshit “order handling”, “front running”, stand alone “P&D” (per my TCR: just a tool used to facilitate the laundering/naked shorting), “market access”, “Covid disclosures”, etc etc complaints, the SEC guarantees the activity will continue.¶
It does in July 2021.¶
Cheers!¶
Chris¶
From: Chris Dilorio <¶
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 5:50 AM¶