Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Aug. 30, 2021

Email discussing news coverage of Prince Andrew in the Epstein probe, Aug 2021

Internal email discussing press coverage of DOJ efforts to interview Prince Andrew about Epstein, including State Department comments on MLAT cooperation.Machine-written summary

Subject: RE: SDNY DAILY NEWS CLIPPINGS; MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:53:27 +0000

The article has a fairly generic quote from a U.S. government official about the “close, productive relationship” between our countries on MLAT matters. That was a comment from the State Department, which was run by us before it was given. There is also a statement that “[t]hat office,” referring to SDNY, “sought to pile pressure on Andrew this month by reporting that Andrew was a ‘person of interest’ in the Epstein probe and was considered ‘at least’ a witness.” I do not know what that is a reference too, and I checked with the team, who does not know either.

Did we take the action referenced in the article?

Prince Andrew’s Gilded Cage Closes In as Department of Justice Reiterates Desire to Speak to Disgraced Royal

((thedailybeast.com))

Fine if we did.

EFTA00070201

Email discussing news coverage of Prince Andrew in the Epstein probe, Aug 2021

Emails and letters

Internal email discussing press coverage of DOJ efforts to interview Prince Andrew about Epstein, including State Department comments on MLAT cooperation.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Aug. 30, 2021

Subject: RE: SDNY DAILY NEWS CLIPPINGS; MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:53:27 +0000 The article has a fairly generic quote from a U.S. government official about the “close, productive relationship” between our countries on MLAT matters. That was a comment from the State Department, which was run by us before it was given. There is also a statement that “[t]hat office,” referring to SDNY, “sought to pile pressure on Andrew this month by reporting that Andrew was a ‘person of interest’ in the Epstein probe and was considered ‘at least’ a witness.” I do not know what that is a r…