Correspondence, 2020-04-28

EFTA00069409¶

Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower¶

From: Chris Dilorio <¶

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 7:24 AM¶

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix¶

Per my extensive SEC TCR’s: Josh Sason/Emanuel/Abitebol/Hanover/Magna extensive overlap with NITE/VIRT (and AQR) money laundering shells.¶

The SEC Sason/Magna/NewLead Feb 2019 complaint: also my information https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2019/comp24403.pdf¶

Marc P. Berger SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Brookfield Place 200 Vesey Street, Suite 400 New York, NY 10281-1022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSHUA SASON, MARC MANUEL,¶

3 5. In addition, Pallas acted as an underwriter for a primary offering of NewLead stock, which NewLead attempted to disguise as an asset sale transaction.¶

www.sec.gov¶

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1322587/000114420413065095/v361773_sc13g.htm¶

www.sec.gov¶

(i) Sole power to vote or to direct the vote . The information required by Item 4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person.¶

www.sec.gov¶

MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol¶

But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting?¶

EFTA00069410¶

AND, per my extensive correspondence with the SEC re my TCR’s: The SEC is ALSO grossly under estimating the criminal activity in NITE/Magna/NewLead¶

SEC: Criminals bailing out/actively facilitating criminals/criminal activity.¶

soliciting/using whistleblower information in unethical/illegal manner to bring complaints/obstruct¶

complaints/deny whistleblower rightful compensation.¶

Cheers!¶

Christopher J Dilorio¶

Whistleblower¶

From: Chris Dilorio <¶

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 6:43 AM¶

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix¶

More evidence of SEC fraud on the court in Gibraltar.¶

It is CLEAR that the Opco AML Covered Action 2015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d’Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my information. However, the SEC Opco complaint even stops short of a thorough investigation of the ENTIRETY of the FINRA trading activity. WHY? WHY didn’t the SEC Opco/Gibraltar complaint go into trading activity in the FINRA AML OTCM shells through 2014 as FINCEN did? WHY did the SEC omit MATERIAL information to the court in Gibraltar causing a “significant under estimating” of criminal activity? The SEC knows who the accounts were. The SEC knows who the executing BD’s/MM’s were. The SEC committed a fraud on the court in Gibraltar.¶

Gibraltar was ROLLING OUT NEW OTCM services into the end of 2011.¶

https://www.pr.com/press-release/355246¶

Gibraltar Global Securities Now Offering Offshore Brokerage Accounts - PR.com¶

Nassau, Bahamas, The, September 22, 2011 —()— Gibraltar Global Securities is now offering offshore brokerage accounts in addition to their broad array of financial services.Gibraltar Global …¶

www.pr.com¶

https://www.pr.com/press-release/355247¶