Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence

Email comments on draft FBI remarks about Epstein's Palm Beach offenses

Email comments on a draft of FBI remarks, correcting the period of Epstein's offenses and wording about massages and victims.Machine-written summary

Circling back on this from earlier this week, I don’t know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there’s no allegation (and it’s not factually correct) that the victims “were made to give” massages – it would be accurate, though, to say “… who gave Epstein massages …”

Also this may just be me, but I think of a “child” as being pre-puberty – I think is going to say “underage girls” if they want to be consistent? – but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature.

Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked them over quickly and they seem to track ours pretty closely. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks.

EFTA00068406

Email comments on draft FBI remarks about Epstein's Palm Beach offenses

Emails and letters

Email comments on a draft of FBI remarks, correcting the period of Epstein's offenses and wording about massages and victims.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9

Circling back on this from earlier this week, I don’t know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there’s no allegation (and it’s not factually correct) that the victims “were made to give” massages – it would be accurate, though, to say “... who gave Epstein massages . . .” Also this may just be me, but I think of a “child” as being pre-puberty – I think is going to say “underage girls” if they want to be consistent? – but of course defer to the FBI on thei…