Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · July 8, 2008

Email about revised declaration and response in Epstein plea proceedings, July 2008

A prosecutor's email circulating a revised declaration and government response, omitting plea negotiation details and remarks on Epstein's attorneys' misconduct accusationsMachine-written summary

Subject: Revised Declaration & Response

Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:41:56 +0000

Importance: Normal

Attachments: victim_resp_USArev.wpd;

Declaration-v2.wpd

has reviewed my draft response and your final declaration. He wanted to leave out specific details regarding the plea negotiations, since plea discussions are normally held in confidence. Also, he wanted to leave out Epstein’s attorneys’ undue haste in hurling accusations of misconduct at the prosecution, since that does not address the claims presented by petitioner.

I have revised the response and your declaration accordingly. Please review both to ensure they are accurate. Thanks.

<<victim_resp_USArev.wpd>> << Declaration-v2.wpd>>

| EFTA00067530 | | :--- | :--- |

This is a simple Markdown document with no headings or paragraphs. It contains a single line of text.

Email about revised declaration and response in Epstein plea proceedings, July 2008

Emails and letters

A prosecutor's email circulating a revised declaration and government response, omitting plea negotiation details and remarks on Epstein's attorneys' misconduct accusations

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · July 8, 2008

Subject: Revised Declaration & Response Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:41:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: victim resp USArev.wpd; Declaration-v2.wpd has reviewed my draft response and your final declaration. He wanted to leave out specific details regarding the plea negotiations, since plea discussions are normally held in confidence. Also, he wanted to leave out Epstein’s attorneys’ undue haste in hurling accusations of misconduct at the prosecution, since that does not address the claims presented by petitioner. I have revised the response and your declaration accordingly. Please review …