Correspondence · 2020

Email from a private individual criticizing an SEC Form 13F rule change proposal

An email from a private individual complaining that an SEC Form 13F rule proposal reduces transparency and benefits certain named investment entities.Machine-written summary

EFTA00065374¶

From: Chris Dilorio <¶

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 10:50 AM¶

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix¶

Janey, Hoecker, Jay et al still MORE SEC attempts to cover up illegal activity at the expense of the public it is mandated to protect.The SEC latest Rule change proposal https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-152

SEC.gov | SEC Proposes Amendments to Update Form 13F for Institutional Investment Managers; Amend Reporting Threshold to Reflect Today’s Equities Markets¶

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it has proposed to amend Form 13F to update the reporting threshold for institutional investment managers and make other targeted changes.¶

www.sec.gov ¶

Will exempt 90% of current 13F filers from future equity holdings disclosures.¶

WHO does that benefit? Certainly not the public the SEC is mandated to protect. LESS transparency still for the likes of Keener,Sason,Asher/Kramer,IBC,Ironridge/Coulston,Alpha,Dutchess,Crede, etc etc etc¶

Costs to file: pocket change¶

https://www.netacn.com/Service.aspx?id=dLfmwmZHCkOsIL-sP3V8Dw ¶

Also released as

The same pages were released more than once, under different numbers.

Keyboard shortcuts

Go to a page: `g` then

Email from a private individual criticizing an SEC Form 13F rule change proposal

SEC.gov | SEC Proposes Amendments to Update Form 13F for Institutional Investment Managers; Amend Reporting Threshold to Reflect Today’s Equities Markets¶

Also released as

Other documents from the same file