Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence

Plaintiff's counsel emails with DOJ about document productions in v. Maxwell case

Email exchanges between the plaintiff's law firm and a government attorney coordinating production of documents, indexing, and a call in the defamation case against Maxwell.Machine-written summary

Sigrid,

Totally understand, and we appreciate the information. We’ve received both productions, as well as an initial index, and we’re happy to talk further about what if anything would be additionally useful.

As a threshold question, following the productions from Thursday and Friday, do you expect to make any further production(s), or are they fully or substantially complete? I ask just so we can manage our upload and transmittal processes here.

And it would be great to talk with you about the materials, thank you – we wanted to peruse them for a couple days initially, but it obviously is a large volume and so I think it would make sense to chat at your convenience. Is there a time tomorrow that would work for you? We’re available anytime except 11-12 and 2-3, if there’s a slot that works, or can also figure out a time for later in the week if that’s preferable, no problem.

thanks very much,

We can provide you with a separate index but our first priority today is rolling more documents out to you. If you would prefer we switch our focus to an index we can do that but I would not that each of the files outlines what the document is when you click on it. If I can get an extra staff member to work on an index while Sandy works on loading more into the production I will do so.

If you want to have a call I can also direct you through some of the materials. For example there are some experts we had in our case that related solely to the defamation claims so they will not necessarily be of interest to you – whereas there are other people who we considered to be key witnesses. I’m around today if you would like to speak.

Let me know how you would like to handle.

Thanks,

Sigrid

Sigrid McCawley

Partner

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

EFTA00040510

Sandra,

We’ve received the materials and were able to download them, thanks very much. We were also wondering—and this may be a question for Peter and/or Sigrid—whether, similar to the prior production, we might be able to get an index of the materials?

thanks again,

Mr. Rossmiller,

On behalf of attorney, Peter Skinner, please see the attached correspondence. In addition, I will be transmitting a secured link to related materials via our BSF ShareFile system. Please feel free to contact me should you have any difficulty accessing the materials.

Sandra Perkins

Case Manager

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

Subject: RE: legal process, regarding In re Guiffre v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433

Plaintiff's counsel emails with DOJ about document productions in v. Maxwell case

Emails and letters

Email exchanges between the plaintiff's law firm and a government attorney coordinating production of documents, indexing, and a call in the defamation case against Maxwell.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9

Sigrid, Totally understand, and we appreciate the information. We’ve received both productions, as well as an initial index, and we’re happy to talk further about what if anything would be additionally useful. As a threshold question, following the productions from Thursday and Friday, do you expect to make any further production(s), or are they fully or substantially complete? I ask just so we can manage our upload and transmittal processes here. And it would be great to talk with you about the materials, thank you – we wanted to peruse them for a couple days initially, but it obviously is a …