Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · April 19, 2021

Emails on conferrals and redactions in US v Maxwell, April 2021

Two 2021 emails between counsel in US v Maxwell scheduling a conference on pretrial disclosure deadlines and agreeing to defense-proposed redactions and sealing.Machine-written summary

EFTA00039823

The Government agrees with the defense’s proposed redactions to Reply Brief 10, which are narrowly tailored to cover information implicating the personal privacy interests of third parties and are consistent with prior redactions in earlier briefing. The Government further agrees that Exhibit A to Reply Brief 10 should be filed under seal to protect the personal privacy interests of the third party implicated in the document.

Thanks,

From:

Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 12:31 PM

To:

Subject: US v Maxwell - [conferrals regarding pretrial disclosures & redactions to replies]

Counsel -

I am writing to schedule a time for counsel to formally confer on two issues.

First, we need to confer regarding the pretrial disclosure deadlines, as directed in the Court’s Friday order (Dkt. 207 at 34). Although we tentatively discussed some possible deadlines while we were together last week, the Court’s opinion includes other upcoming deadlines we did not discuss and we may need to adjust our proposals based on her opinion.

Second, we need to confer regarding redactions to the as yet undocketed Replies in support of our Pretrial Motions (Dkt. 205).

We are generally available tomorrow (Tuesday) for a call. Please let me know a time that works from your end and I can circulate a dial-in number.

Thanks,

EFTA00039824

Emails on conferrals and redactions in US v Maxwell, April 2021

Emails and letters

Two 2021 emails between counsel in US v Maxwell scheduling a conference on pretrial disclosure deadlines and agreeing to defense-proposed redactions and sealing.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · April 19, 2021

EFTA00039823 The Government agrees with the defense's proposed redactions to Reply Brief 10, which are narrowly tailored to cover information implicating the personal privacy interests of third parties and are consistent with prior redactions in earlier briefing. The Government further agrees that Exhibit A to Reply Brief 10 should be filed under seal to protect the personal privacy interests of the third party implicated in the document. Thanks, From: Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 12:31 PM To: Subject: US v Maxwell - [conferrals regarding pretrial disclosures & redactions to replies] Counsel -…