Attached is Judge Nathan’s order on the last round of post-trial motions. I’m happy to report that this now means that all post-trial motions are resolved, and we are proceeding to sentencing as scheduled.¶
Have a great weekend—¶
From:¶
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 4:54 PM¶
To:¶
Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Memorandum & Opinion¶
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this email because the mail box is unattended.¶
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS••• There is no charge for viewing opinions.¶
U.S. District Court¶
Southern District of New York¶
Notice of Electronic Filing¶
The following transaction was entered on 4/29/2022 at 4:54 PM EDT and filed on 4/29/2022¶
Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Filer:¶
Document Number:657¶
Docket Text:¶
OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell…[*** See this Opinion & Order ***]… V. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies the Defendant’s Rule 29 motion because the jury’s guilty verdicts were supported by the witness testimony and documentary evidence presented at trial. The Court denies the Defendant’s motion based on constructive amendment or¶
variance because the jury instructions, the Government’s evidence at trial, and summation all captured the core of criminality charged in the Indictment, and the Defendant was not prejudiced by any alleged variance. Further, because the Government neither intentionally delayed its prosecution nor was the Defendant prejudiced by any delay, the Court also denies the Defendant’s motion based on pre-indictment delay. Finally, the Court grants the Defendant’s motion as to multiplicity. The Government concedes that Count One is multiplicitous with Count Three, and the Court further concludes that Count Five is multiplicitous with Count Three. Count Five, like Counts One and Three, charged the Defendant’s participation in the same decade-long unlawful agreement with the Defendant’s continuous coconspirator, Jeffrey Epstein, to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. Accordingly, the Court will enter judgment of conviction on Counts Three, Four, and Six. The Defendant’s sentencing date remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. The Court previously set a schedule for sentencing submissions that remains in effect. Dkt. No. 656. This resolves Dkt. No. 599. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/29/2022)(bw)¶
1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been delivered by other means to:¶
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:¶
Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1008691343 [Date=4/29/2022] [FileNumber=27635391- 0][258d685fd4a9ec9f557e63041f6c60de8f7c700a96b11818b855f78a5161d633f3 964ecfa40697c597b6aa61010e8faa4638295652406c73c181d6fc5ff1c21131]¶