Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 16, 2019

SDNY prosecutor email on transporting Epstein evidence, March 2019

An SDNY assistant U.S. attorney emails colleagues about transferring physical evidence, excluding massage tables, and questions numbering in the evidence list.Machine-written summary

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Evidence for transport
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 22:18:31 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 2019-03-16,JE,evidence_list(prior investigation).xlsx

This was from a while back, but wanted to follow up on the question of physical evidence. I’ve reviewed the list (I thought it was really difficult to read, so I reformatted it significantly, though without any substantive changes — see attached) and I think the answer is we should have everything transferred up here with the exception of extremely large items. Specifically, I think at this stage we do not need to be housing the following:

  • 1B2 31: Green massage table 182 —43: Peach massage table 181 —6: Beige massage table 181 — 7: Brown massage table Also, for some of the entries there are numbers next to the descriptions in parentheses. For most of those, it looks like either the number of the type of thing or just a repeat of the sub-number of the various item numbers in the first column. For item number 1B2, a bunch of the entries have numbers (following the descriptions) that don’t seem to be either of those things. Is there any significance to those numbers?? I just want to make sure there are no issues with our records of what exists.

Let us know if any questions or issues — and obviously anybody please say the word if you disagree about holding off on bringing up the massage tables — and thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York

SDNY prosecutor email on transporting Epstein evidence, March 2019

Emails and letters

An SDNY assistant U.S. attorney emails colleagues about transferring physical evidence, excluding massage tables, and questions numbering in the evidence list.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · March 16, 2019

| From: | | |--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| | To: | | | Cc: | | | | | | | Subject: RE: Evidence for transport | | | Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 22:18:31 +0000 | | Importance: Normal | | | | Attachments: 2019-03-16, JE,evidence list (prior investigation).xlsx | This was from a while back, but wanted to follow up on the question of physical evidence. I've reviewed the list (I thought it was really difficult to read, so I reformatted it significantly, though without any substantive changes — see attached) and I think the answer is we should…