| From: To: Subject: RE: FW: records management (Epstein investigation) Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 11:48:05 +0000 Importance: Normal |
|---|
| Thank= I’ll circle back. |
| ew Yor 4, 2019 7:26 AM, O wrote: What is your availability today or tomorrow? I will be around until 1:30 today, then I have to leave. I am available until 2:30 tomorrow. Let me know what works. |
| From • M onc l i June Subject: RE: FW: records management (Epstein investigation) |
| Let me know when you can discuss this, I want to bring in the case agents. Sean |
| From To Subject: Re: FW: records management (Epstein investigation) Let’s touch base on Monday. |
| On May 31, 2019 2:04 PM, wrote: We have received the files and it looks like everything is here. Let me know when you have a moment to discuss. Thanks, |
| en t: I nursaay May Z3, 2U19 1: Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation) |
Wanted to quickly follow up on this to see if there’s any update on status (both in terms of whether the documents are en route, and also the prospects for our office managing the vendor process)? Please let us know when you have a chance? And if anything else from us would be helpful, we’re happy to do whatever we can to get the gears turning.¶
thanks again,¶
From: Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 17:33¶
Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation)¶
Thanks very much again for talking with us earlier, and we wanted to get you the example cases as promised—it’s a number of cases so hopefully that’s helpful. I think the ideal would be for the materials to come directly to us so our paralegals can manage the process with the vendor (unless the documents are already on their way to the New York field office), and then we can send them either to you or back to Florida once they’ve been scanned.¶
The following investigations have been with our office and FBI where we’ve used outside vendors, including for original and highly sensitive documents (such as medical records, personnel records, etc.):¶
| U.S. v. Chambe | ||
|---|---|---|
| U.S. v. Adelyrics | ||
| U.S. v. Ng Lap S | ||
| U.S. v. Tortora, | ||
| U.S. v. Ashraf H | ||
| U.S. v. Goldbren | ||
| U.S. v. Vargas, | ||
| U.S. v. Krupkin, | ||
| U.S. v. Cruz, ov |
In terms of the vendor, we choose from a small number of organizations that work with us regularly, and they keep all the information strictly confidential (by contractual requirement, most importantly, though also from a desire to be able to continue to get work with us). I’m not aware of any instances where that has been a problem.¶
Please do let us know if any other info would be helpful, and we’re also happy to chat with anybody who wants to talk with us about it, and hopefully we can finalize this week.¶
thanks again¶