Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Nov. 2, 2023

Brief defending claims administrator against a class member's objection, Nov. 2023

Court filing in the Epstein victims' compensation settlement case arguing a class member's objections about conflicts of interest and attorneys' fees are meritless.Machine-written summary

C. Ms. Fails to Credibly Allege Any Conflicts of Interests Held by the Claims Administrator or Other Problems with Claims Administration.

Ms. prief suggests the existence of “potential conflicts of interest” between the

9 Ms. does not dispute that she and her counsel received the Notice or that she elected not to opt of the Settlement despite having the opportunity to do so. Nor does she claim that either Class Counsel or the Claims Administrator ever failed to answer any of her questions or provide her with information that she requested concerning the Settlement or Plan of Allocation.

2023-11-02 Class Council Objection .pdf 16

Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 21 of 23

EFTA00037099

Claims Administrator and Class Members. It also refers to a conflict with Class Counsel, claiming without substantiation that Class Counsel “has maintained personal and professional relationships with Epstein’s known associates with inadequate disclosure about the nature and scope of those relationships including prior law partners.” ECF No. 247, at 6. Ms. declaration is more direct: it accuses the Claims Administrator and Class Counsel of having “multiple conflicts of interest.” ECF No. 247-1 ¶ 25; see also id. at ¶¶ 13, 26. These claims are meritless.1° Ms. 2023-11-02 Class Council Objection .pdf -provides no basis for her allegations of conflict, and the Court therefore has no reason to

doubt that the Settlement is “fair, reasonable, and adequate,” and “the result of good faith, extensive arm’s-length and non-collusive negotiations.” ECF No. 182 ¶¶ 1, 2.

D. Ms. Objection to the Proposed Attorneys’ Fees Is Meritless.

Brief defending claims administrator against a class member's objection, Nov. 2023

Court filings

Court filing in the Epstein victims' compensation settlement case arguing a class member's objections about conflicts of interest and attorneys' fees are meritless.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · Nov. 2, 2023

C. Ms. Fails to Credibly Allege Any Conflicts of Interests Held by the Claims Administrator or Other Problems with Claims Administration. Ms. prief suggests the existence of "potential conflicts of interest" between the 9 Ms. does not dispute that she and her counsel received the Notice or that she elected not to opt of the Settlement despite having the opportunity to do so. Nor does she claim that either Class Counsel or the Claims Administrator ever failed to answer any of her questions or provide her with information that she requested concerning the Settlement or Plan of Allocation. 2023-1…