Correspondence · July 8, 2019
A law professor emails prosecutors noting the sex trafficking indictment cites a nonexistent statute, 18 USC 1594(c)(1), and urges correction.Machine-written summary
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 18:55:31 +0000¶
I note that the forfeiture is being done under a special Human Trafficking statute. In paragraph 25 of the indictment, you refer to 18 USC 1594(c)(1). But you meant 1594(d)(1). 1594(c)(1) does not exist.¶
Typos in indictments have disastrous consequences, as I am sure you know. So you might want to correct this.¶
Emails and letters
A law professor emails prosecutors noting the sex trafficking indictment cites a nonexistent statute, 18 USC 1594(c)(1), and urges correction.
DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · July 8, 2019
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 18:55:31 +0000 Hello, I am a law professor. I note that the forfeiture is being done under a special Human Trafficking statute. In paragraph 25 of the indictment, you refer to 18 USC 1594(c)(1). But you meant 1594(d)(1). 1594(c)(1) does not exist. Typos in indictments have disastrous consequences, as I am sure you know. So you might want to correct this.
Retrieved from https://epstein-index.org/documents/ds8-efta00032974/.