Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · July 10, 2019

Email quoting report of Acosta's 2017 transition interview on the Epstein deal

An email dated July 10, 2019 quoting a report that Alexander Acosta told Trump transition interviewers he was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' before the non-prosecution deal.Machine-written summary

From

Subject: transition Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:02:06 +0000 Importance: Normal

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein `belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)

https://www.thedaily njeffre psteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight

Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York

Email quoting report of Acosta's 2017 transition interview on the Epstein deal

Emails and letters

An email dated July 10, 2019 quoting a report that Alexander Acosta told Trump transition interviewers he was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' before the non-prosecution deal.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · July 10, 2019

| From | | | | |------|--|--|--| | | | | | Subject: transition Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:02:06 +0000 Importance: Normal "Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?" Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he'd had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He'd cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein's attorneys because he had "been told" to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. "I was told Epstein `belonged to intelligence' and to leave it alone," he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who …