Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 9, 2021

Defense email objecting to government redactions in U.S. v. Maxwell, March 2021

FYI

From: Laura Menninge
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:08 PM
To:
Cc:Cas;
(USANYS)) <>; ‘BOBBI C STERNHEIM’
• Jeff PagliucaChristian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP

Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) — Objections to Gov’t Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response

Dear Judge Nathan —

Pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court’s individual rules, attached is a letter setting forth Ms. Maxwell’s objections to the redactions proposed by the government to their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5. Also attached are exhibits setting forth Ms. Maxwell’s proposed redactions.

Best regards, Laura A. Menninger

Laura A. Menninger I Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue I Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office)

Defense email objecting to government redactions in U.S. v. Maxwell, March 2021

Emails and letters

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · March 9, 2021

FYI | From: Laura Menninge | | | | |--------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--------------------------------------------| | Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:08 PM | | | | | To: | | | | | Cc: | | Cas; | | | (USANYS) | | ) < | ; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' | | | • Jeff Pagliuca | | Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP | | | | | | Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response Dear Judge Nathan — Pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court's individual rules, attached is a letter setting forth Ms. Maxwell's objections…