Correspondence · Feb. 23, 2021

SDNY prosecutors' email chain on opposing a NPA-related motion, Feb 2021

Email exchange among SDNY prosecutors sharing comments on a draft government opposition brief to a defendant's NPA-related motion.Machine-written summary

From: ‘ To: ‘ Subject: RE: NPA Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:04:50 +0000 Attachments: 2021-02-26_GM_Government_OppositioniNPAUMCUAR).doex
Hi all,
My comments attached. I think we’re in great shape too — we have a lot of convincing reasons her motion should be denied.
I’m around to discuss anytime.
Thanks,
From: Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:54 PM To:
Subject: RE: NPA
and IM have also reviewed? Thanks. Thanks for the close read — can the three of us chat after
From: Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:46 PM To: O;
Subject: RE: NPA
. I think this is in great shape and is very compelling. Some small edits and my responses to your Thanks very much, comments attached. Happy to jump on a call if that would be useful.

From:
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:02 AM
To:

Subject: NPA

All,¶

Attached is the most recent draft of the NPA brief. Apologies for the delay, I really struggled with this one. I think our arguments in the first half are strong, but I’m really not wild about the second half. Would very much appreciate your comments/edits. I’ve also flagged a few issues for consideration/discussion. If you’re able to review tomorrow morning, that would be great.¶

Thanks,¶

Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York¶

Discuss on Bluesky

Retrieved from https://epstein-index.org/documents/ds8-efta00026601/.

Keyboard shortcuts

Go to a page: `g` then

SDNY prosecutors' email chain on opposing a NPA-related motion, Feb 2021