Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Jan. 22, 2021

Prosecutor email querying "gmax" search hits in warrant database, Jan. 2021

An SDNY Assistant US Attorney emails a colleague saying the low "gmax" hit count seems wrong and recalling few Epstein–Maxwell emails.Machine-written summary

Yes, that sounds about right to me. As I recall, there were not a lot of emails between Epstein and Maxwell, and the majority of the Maxwell emails came from just one of the thumb drives in the New York residence.

From:
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:49 PM
To:>
Cc:
Subject: relativity

When I run the term “gmax” as a search term in the search warrant database, I’m getting only 3,835 hits. That seems low to me. Is that right? I know you’re on the road, so no rush, but when you have a chance to check that would be helpful.

Thanks,

Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York

Prosecutor email querying "gmax" search hits in warrant database, Jan. 2021

Emails and letters

An SDNY Assistant US Attorney emails a colleague saying the low "gmax" hit count seems wrong and recalling few Epstein–Maxwell emails.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · Jan. 22, 2021

Yes, that sounds about right to me. As I recall, there were not a lot of emails between Epstein and Maxwell, and the majority of the Maxwell emails came from just one of the thumb drives in the New York residence. | From: | | |----------------------------------------|---| | Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:49 PM | | | To: | | | Cc: | | | Subject: relativity | | | | | When I run the term "gmax" as a search term in the search warrant database, I'm getting only 3,835 hits. That seems low to me. Is that right? I know you're on the road, so no rush, but when you have a chance to check that would be…