Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · July 13, 2019

Email chain among Epstein defense counsel on bail records, July 2019

Email exchange in U.S. v. Epstein between defense counsel Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and prosecutors about discovery records and the government's bail opposition filing.Machine-written summary

</i<>
From: “Martin G. Weinberg” ccl
To: “
Cc: Reid Weingarten <i< td="">>, ‘Martin Weinberg’>, ‘Martin Weinberg’
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 21:34:39 +0000

Hi M, would a more targeted request for 1 month of the 5 years of records - the month of the two wires - result in Reid/myself reviewing these records prior to Monday’s hearing? And if you could give us the names of the recipients of the two wires that too would help Thanks Marty

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.

From:
)
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2019 2:36 PM
To: Martin G. Weinberg <
Cc: Reid Weingarten <
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum

Hi Marty,

We do expect to produce them as part of Rule 16 discovery. I expect we may reference financial information in connection with filings as necessary appropriate, as we did in Friday’s submission, but we’ll of course provide the full materials to you as discovery.

thanks,

From: Martin G. Weinberg < Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 18:28 To: Cc: ‘Martin Weinberg’ <->; Reid Weingarten Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum

M, we request a copy of the records obtained from Institution 1. We would request that they be provided as discovery and not as part of a public filing. Let me know if you consent to that production. Otherwise enjoy your weekend Marty

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.

) [mailto:
From:
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 5:40 PM
To:‘
Cc:‘Martin Weinberg’
>; ‘rweingarten@steptoe.com’
<
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum

To the Chambers of Judge Berman:

With apologies for the delay, attached please find a courtesy copy of the Government’s reply in support of its detention memo and in opposition to the defendant’s motion for bail, including exhibits, filed this afternoon in the above-captioned case. Defense counsel is copied.

I hope everyone has a good weekend.

Thank you,

Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York

Email chain among Epstein defense counsel on bail records, July 2019

Emails and letters

Email exchange in U.S. v. Epstein between defense counsel Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and prosecutors about discovery records and the government's bail opposition filing.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · July 13, 2019

| From: "Martin G. Weinberg" ccl | | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| | To: " | | | Cc: Reid Weingarten <i< td="" <td &gt;, 'Martin Weinberg'</td </i< | , 'Martin Weinberg' | | Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Government bail memorandum | | | Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 21:34:39 +0000 | | Hi M, would a more targeted request for 1 month of the 5 years of records - the month of the two wires - result in Reid/myself reviewing these records prior to Monday's hearing? And if you could give us the names of the recipients …