Emails among SDNY prosecutors on a supposedly sealed Epstein order, 2021
Email chain among federal prosecutors discussing a 2019 sealed order on unsealing civil discovery, noting it was public despite being marked sealed.Machine-written summary
Subject: RE: Boles Schiller—Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:34:50 +0000¶
This is a 2019 order that was recently unsealed. We made an application to modify a protective order in a civil case, and Judge Netbum denied the application.¶
Ori inal Messa e
(USANYS) aNIMME> From:
Sent: Tuesda March 30 2021 10:21 AM To:
Subject: Boies Schiller—Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order
Do you know what this is about?
Ori inal Messa e
(USAGAN) From:
Sent: Tuesda , March 30, 2021 9:08 AM (USANYS) aNIMME>
To: Subject: FW: IN RE APPLICATION TO UNSEAL CIVIL DISCOVERY MATERIALS, USAO Reference No. 2018R01618.
This is weird to me. The order says it is sealed, but it’s quite public, as you can see.
Emails among SDNY prosecutors on a supposedly sealed Epstein order, 2021
Emails and letters
Email chain among federal prosecutors discussing a 2019 sealed order on unsealing civil discovery, noting it was public despite being marked sealed.
DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · March 30, 2021
Subject: RE: Boles Schiller--Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:34:50 +0000 This is a 2019 order that was recently unsealed. We made an application to modify a protective order in a civil case, and Judge Netbum denied the application. | Ori inal Messa e | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | (USANYS) aNIMME <br From: | | Sent: Tuesda<br March 30 2021 10:21 AM<br To: | | Subject: Boies Schiller--Jeffrey Epstein Supposedly Sealed Order | | Do you know what this is about? | | Ori inal Mess…
Retrieved from https://epstein-index.org/documents/ds8-efta00019095/.