Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Sept. 17, 2008

2008 emails among prosecutors on unsealing Epstein's non-prosecution agreement

Email chain in which federal prosecutors, Barry Krischer, and a newspaper's counsel discuss the sealed Epstein non-prosecution agreement and possible unsealing.Machine-written summary

From: To: (USAFLS)” Cc: Subject: RE: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:25:42 +0000

Importance: Normal

Nothing like emails that cross in the wind.

From: S (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:22 AM To: USAFLS

Cc (USAFLS) Subject: RE: State v. Jeffrey Epstein

I have reviewed the Agreement. We have no obligation to seek its continued sealing. Per my conversation with Marie, she is going to notify Jack Goldberger that he has yet to file the remainder of the Agreement and that the unsealing issue is between him/Epstein and the SAO’s office.

From: %/Marano, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein

Will it never end? Barry ICrisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle this issue?

Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401

From (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:48 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein

From: Barry Krischer Sent: Wednesda , September 17, 2008 10:46 AM To: USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein

Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea.

From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein

How to proceed? Lanna

From: Bryce Albu Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM To: Lanna Belohlavek Cc: Martin Reeder Subject: State v. Jeffrey Epstein

Ms. Belohlavek,

We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience.

Very truly yours,

C. Bryce Albu Reeder & Reeder P.A. 250 S. Central Blvd., Suite 200

2008 emails among prosecutors on unsealing Epstein's non-prosecution agreement

Emails and letters

Email chain in which federal prosecutors, Barry Krischer, and a newspaper's counsel discuss the sealed Epstein non-prosecution agreement and possible unsealing.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · Sept. 17, 2008

From: To: (USAFLS)" Cc: Subject: RE: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:25:42 +0000 Importance: Normal Nothing like emails that cross in the wind. From: S (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:22 AM To: USAFLS Cc (USAFLS) Subject: RE: State v. Jeffrey Epstein I have reviewed the Agreement. We have no obligation to seek its continued sealing. Per my conversation with Marie, she is going to notify Jack Goldberger that he has yet to file the remainder of the Agreement and that the unsealing issue is between him/Epstein and the SAO's office. From: %/Marano, Ann Marie C. (…