Correspondence · June 3, 2008
An email dated June 3, 2008 transmits revised versions of a draft indictment, one with a draft watermark and one without.Machine-written summary
| From: | |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | |
| Bcc: | |
| Subject: Draft Indictment | |
| Date: The, 03 Jun 2008 14:43:19 +0000 | |
| Importance: Normal | |
| Attachments: 080429 revised indictment without Watermark.wpd; | |
| 080429 reviseendictment_with tatermark.wpd |
Hid Mig ailed and said that Weeded a copy of this. The first copy has a “draft” watermark on it, an i t e secon is exactly the same except that the watermark is removed.¶
«080429 revised indictment without Watermark.wpd» Thanks!¶
«080429 revised indictment with Watermadtwpd»¶
Emails and letters
An email dated June 3, 2008 transmits revised versions of a draft indictment, one with a draft watermark and one without.
DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 8 · June 3, 2008
| From: | | |--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| | To: | | | Cc: | | | Bcc: | | | | Subject: Draft Indictment | | | Date: The, 03 Jun 2008 14:43:19 +0000 | | Importance: Normal | | | | Attachments: 080429 revised indictment without Watermark.wpd; | | | 080429 reviseendictment with tatermark.wpd | Hid Mig ailed and said that Weeded a copy of this. The first copy has a "draft" watermark on it, an i t e secon is exactly the same except that the watermark is removed. «080429 revised indictment without Watermark.wpd» Thanks! «080429 revised indictme…
Retrieved from https://epstein-index.org/documents/ds8-efta00013998/.