Correspondence · March 11, 2020

Email chain forwarding an article on royals' comments about Epstein, March 2020

Email forwards of a media article about a British prince commenting on another royal's friendship with Epstein, discussing its publicity value.Machine-written summary

From: ‘
To:	‘
Cc: “
Subject: RE:	: Yahoo Lifestyle - “Prince Harry Comments on Prince Andrew’s
	Friendship with Jeffrey Epstein in Prank Phone Call”
	Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:04:47 +0000

This had Prince Andrew, Prince Harry and Megan Markel in the same story.¶

From: Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 7:03 PM To: Cc: Yahoo Lifestyle - “Prince Harry Comments on Prince Andrew’s Friendship with Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein in Prank Phone Call” Nothing that I recall even comes close. For context, a really important WSJ or Times articles average about




S250-500k.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2020, at 6:48 PM, > wrote:
Has any other article come close to that? An estimated 231,333,672 readers.
From:
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 6:25 PM
To:
Yahoo Lifestyle - “Prince Harry Comments on Prince Andrew’s Friendship with Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein in Prank Phone Call”
This article is estimated to have over $4M in publicity value. Insane.

From: Critical Mention <alertpcriticalmention.com></alertpcriticalmention.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 6:02 PM To:

Subject: Epstein in Prank Phone Call” : Yahoo Lifestyle - “Prince Harry Comments on Prince Andrew’s Friendship with Jeffrey¶

Retrieved from https://epstein-index.org/documents/ds8-efta00009823/.

Keyboard shortcuts

Go to a page: `g` then

Email chain forwarding an article on royals' comments about Epstein, March 2020