Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · June 25, 2022

Court filing, 2022-06-25

Defense counsel an attorney writes Judge Alison Nathan opposing two individuals giving oral victim impact statements at Maxwell's sentencing.Machine-written summary

Document EFTA 02838563

212-243-1100 • Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715 917-912-9698 • Cell New York, NY 10007 888.587-4737 • Fox bcstemheim@maccom

June 25, 2022

Honorable Alison J. Nathan Sitting By Designation United States District Court 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10010

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN)

Dear Judge Nathan:

This letter is submitted in response to the motion and exhibits filed by counsel for and requesting permission for both individuals to give oral victim impact statements during Ms. Maxwell’s sentencing hearing. See Dkt. 675, 675-1, 675-2. We oppose the motion for the reasons stated in our previous submissions on this issue and incorporated herein (Dkt. 667, 672): Neither should be denied in its entirety. qualify as statutory crime victims under the CVRA. The motion

cc: Counsel of Record

Very truly yours,

/s/

BOBBI C. STERNHEIM

Court filing, 2022-06-25

Court filings

Defense counsel an attorney writes Judge Alison Nathan opposing two individuals giving oral victim impact statements at Maxwell's sentencing.

Court Records: United States v. Maxwell (S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cr-00330) · June 25, 2022

Document EFTA 02838563 212-243-1100 • Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715 917-912-9698 • Cell New York, NY 10007 888.587-4737 • Fox bcstemheim@maccom June 25, 2022 Honorable Alison J. Nathan Sitting By Designation United States District Court 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10010 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: This letter is submitted in response to the motion and exhibits filed by counsel for and requesting permission for both individuals to give oral victim impact statements during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing. See Dkt. 675, 675-1, 675-2. We oppose the…