Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Feb. 21, 2022

An attorney letter to Judge Alison Nathan on redactions for juror 50 filings

Defense counsel an attorney writes Judge Nathan proposing redactions to sealed new-trial motions regarding Juror 50's voir dire conduct and juror privacy.Machine-written summary

212-243-1100 • Main 917-912-9698 • Cell 888-587-4737 • Fax

February 21, 2022

Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Dear Judge Nathan:

225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 bcsternheim@mac.com

The annexed documents, previously submitted under seal, contain proposed redactions in conformance with the Court’s Orders (Dkt. 596, 605).1

The proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Juror 50’s conduct during the voir dire process, to ensure juror anonymity and privacy, and to preserve specific factual information developed by the defense that has not been publicly reported and that the defense proposes to inquire about at any forthcoming hearing.

In an abundance of caution, we have proposed redactions to information and data about the responses of other jurors (selected and prospective) to the jury questionnaire because the questionnaires and sealed portions of the voir dire transcript are not part of the public record. The public disclosure of juror information, even if provided anonymously, risks compromising the integrity of the jury selection process and the willingness of potential jurors to disclose personal information.

Very truly yours,

/s/

BOBBI C. STERNHEIM

Attachments cc: Counsel of Record

{sup}' The documents - Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion for a New Trial, the Government’s Opposition, and Ms. Maxwell’s Reply - will remain under seal pending the Court’s decision regarding the proposed redactions.

An attorney letter to Judge Alison Nathan on redactions for juror 50 filings

Emails and letters

Defense counsel an attorney writes Judge Nathan proposing redactions to sealed new-trial motions regarding Juror 50's voir dire conduct and juror privacy.

Court Records: United States v. Maxwell (S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cr-00330) · Feb. 21, 2022

212-243-1100 • Main 917-912-9698 • Cell 888-587-4737 • Fax February 21, 2022 Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 bcsternheim@mac.com The annexed documents, previously submitted under seal, contain proposed redactions in conformance with the Court's Orders (Dkt. 596, 605).1 The proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Jur…