Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Jan. 26, 2022

Judge Alison Nathan order on sealing Maxwell new trial motion, Jan. 26, 2022

Judge Alison Nathan denies sealing sealing arguments, sets deadlines for the new trial motion briefing, and orders briefing on the New York Times' request to unseal juror questionnaires.Machine-written summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America,

—v—

Ghislaine Maxwell,

Defendant.

USDC SDNY DOCU [REDACTED] ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _____ DATE FILED: 1/26/22

20-cr-330 (AJN)

ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:

The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment right to public access is fully safeguarded. At the same time, the Court must act deliberately and hear from the parties in considering these sealing issues in order to ensure the integrity of any potential inquiry process going forward, should one be ordered. That too is in the public, as well as the Defendant’s and the Government’s, interest.

Accordingly, to the extent the Defense requests that arguments in favor of sealing should themselves be sealed, that request is DENIED. Arguments in favor of sealing can be made in such a way so as not to undermine the grounds for seeking sealing or redaction in the first instance.

The Defense is therefore ORDERED to file a letter on the public docket on or before February 1, 2022, that justifies the proposed sealing by reference to the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government may file on ECF a response to the Defense’s justification letter on or before February 4, 2022.

The Government’s opposition to the Defense’s new trial motion is due February 2, 2022. Dkt. No. 571. Per the established practice in this case, the Government must provide a copy via email to the Defense to allow the Defense the opportunity to propose narrowly tailored redactions and/or sealing. If either party proposes redactions to or sealing of the Government’s anticipated opposition, a letter justifying such redactions or sealing must be filed on the public docket. The Defense letter must be filed on or before February 8, 2022, and the Government letter must be filed by February 11, 2022.

The same process will apply for any Defense reply in support, which is due February 9, 2022. Dkt. No. 571. If redactions or sealing are proposed, the Defense letter justifying such requests would be due February 15, 2022, and the Government letter would be due February 18, 2022.

The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to address the New York Times Company’s motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. See Dkt. No. 583. Letters by both parties must be submitted via ECF on or before February 11, 2022.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2022 New York, New York


ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Judge Alison Nathan order on sealing Maxwell new trial motion, Jan. 26, 2022

Court filings

Judge Alison Nathan denies sealing sealing arguments, sets deadlines for the new trial motion briefing, and orders briefing on the New York Times' request to unseal juror questionnaires.

Court Records: United States v. Maxwell (S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cr-00330) · Jan. 26, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCU [REDACTED] ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC : \ \ \ \ \ DATE FILED: 1/26/22 20-cr-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment …